Current:Home > reviewsResearch shows most people should take Social Security at 70: Why you may not want to wait -Elevate Capital Network
Research shows most people should take Social Security at 70: Why you may not want to wait
View
Date:2025-04-18 07:19:55
Choosing your Social Security filing age is perhaps the most important retirement decision you'll make, as it can affect your benefit amount by hundreds of dollars per month.
You can begin claiming as early as age 62, but that comes at a steep price: a permanent benefit reduction of up to 30%. Waiting until age 70 will earn you the maximum possible payments based on your work history, with a bonus of at least 24% on top of your full benefit.
Despite the reduction in benefits, 62 is one of the most popular filing ages. According to 2023 data from the Social Security Administration, roughly one-quarter of both men and women file at 62, while fewer than one in 10 wait until age 70.
When it comes to the ideal age to take Social Security, though, the data is clear: Age 70 is far and away the best time for the majority of retirees. While the data is compelling, here's why that may not be the best move for your retirement.
Research shows filing at 70 is a no-brainer
Taking Social Security benefits at age 70 can maximize your monthly income, sometimes increasing your benefit amount by several hundred dollars per month. But for most older adults, it can maximize your lifetime income, too.
In a 2019 report from United Income, researchers used data from the Social Security Administration to examine retirees' claiming decisions and how those decisions affected their lifetime income. They then determined how many retirees made the ideal claiming choice to maximize their income and at what age older adults should file to earn as much as possible.
They found that claiming before age 64 is the ideal choice for only 6.5% of retirees, while a whopping 57% could have earned more in total by filing at age 70. Furthermore, filing at a less-than-optimal age costs the average retired household around $111,000 in total income over a lifetime.
A separate, similar study from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that a staggering 99.4% of retired households could maximize their lifetime income by waiting until at least age 65 to file, while 91.6% would be best off financially by claiming at age 70.
Additionally, the study revealed that for those aged 55 to 62, specifically, claiming Social Security at the financially optimal age could result in lifetime gains of around $181,623.
When it pays to take benefits sooner
The data may be clear that taking benefits at 70 can maximize your total lifetime income. However, finances are only one part of the equation when it comes to deciding on a filing age. Other factors, like health and marital status, can play an equally important role in this decision.
If your health takes a turn for the worse in your 70s, filing for benefits sooner could give you more time to enjoy retirement. Nobody can predict the future, of course, but life can throw curveballs in an instant. Filing early will reduce your monthly payments, but it could also help you make the most of every moment in case the unthinkable happens.
Also, if you're married to someone who is also entitled to Social Security, it can be a good idea to coordinate your claiming ages. For example, one person may wait until age 70 to earn the maximum payment, while the other files at 62 to make it a little more affordable to retire early.
Finally, filing early can be a smart option if you're on the fence about when to claim. If you change your mind within 12 months of taking benefits, you can withdraw your application and file again later. But if you delay benefits from the start and regret your decision, you can't go back in time for a do-over.
No matter your situation, finances will play only one part in your decision. If your primary goal is to earn as much as possible in retirement, delaying claiming until age 70 is likely your best bet. But if you're aiming to retire earlier for health reasons or otherwise, it sometimes pays to file early. You may need to make some financial sacrifices, but there's more to retirement than just money.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
veryGood! (9)
Related
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Opinion: Tyreek Hill is an imperfect vessel who is perfect for this moment
- You Need to See JoJo Siwa’s NSFW Cover
- 'Wild ride': 8th bull that escaped rodeo in Massachusetts caught after thrilling chase
- How breaking emerged from battles in the burning Bronx to the Paris Olympics stage
- Sean “Diddy” Combs Moved Into Same Jail Housing Unit as Disgraced Exec Sam Bankman-Fried
- 'Wild ride': 8th bull that escaped rodeo in Massachusetts caught after thrilling chase
- Jimmy Carter as a power-playing loner from the farm to the White House and on the global stage
- Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
- Jimmy Kimmel shows concern (jokingly?) as Mike Tyson details training regimen
Ranking
- US Open player compensation rises to a record $65 million, with singles champs getting $3.6 million
- Sean Diddy Combs and Bodyguard Accused of Rape in New Civil Court Filing
- Young Dolph was killed in an alleged hit put out by Yo Gotti's brother, prosecutors claim
- California judge charged in wife’s death is arrested on suspicion of drinking alcohol while on bail
- Big Lots store closures could exceed 300 nationwide, discount chain reveals in filing
- JoJo Siwa's glittery jockstrap and chest plate outfit prompts mixed reactions
- Hawaii has gone down under for invasive species advice – again
- Why does Ozempic cost so much? Senators grilled Novo Nordisk CEO for answers.
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Michael Strahan Wants to Replace “Grandpa” Title With This Unique Name
Pac-12 files federal lawsuit against Mountain West over $43 million in ‘poaching’ penalties
US to hand over pest inspections of Mexican avocados to Mexico and California growers aren’t happy
A steeplechase record at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Then a proposal. (He said yes.)
Opinion: Tyreek Hill is an imperfect vessel who is perfect for this moment
A man who killed 2 Dartmouth professors as a teen is challenging his sentence
Tom Watson, longtime Associated Press broadcast editor in Kentucky, has died at age 85